Fortunately, learning how to be savvy with sources saves time and bolsters the final grade.“If you are writing an actual academic paper, you need to use actual academic resources,” says Morris.
Professors largely want up-to-date, peer-reviewed sources from professional journals.
Nearly every college library subscribes to the most reliable industry journals (such as ), either in print, digital copies, or through a massive database such as JSTOR or the psychology-centric Psych INFO.
Everything branches out from the statement, so an obfuscated thesis throws off a paper’s cohesion.
“A viable thesis is something that has enough support to make the statement, but also will provide room for further research,” says Morris.
There comes a time in every young (and not-so-young) psychology student’s life when the inevitable emerges to challenge them, to stress them, and to encroach upon their precious Xbox time. Not even art majors can escape their nefarious reach.
So a student involved in a writing- and research-intensive program like psychology may as well resign themselves to the one thing that will scoot the process along as painlessly as possible – actually understanding how to put one together. But the following guide provides some information to help alleviate some of the pain.Librarians can provide the necessary login information as well as arrange interlibrary loans should the school not carry a required resource.There’s also the fantastically helpful Google Scholar.All theses must be expressed in concise and straightforward language.Muddying the major themes and ideas with unclear writing will make professors dismiss anything being said.When discussing the details of a specific diagnosis, psychology students must source the latest version of the ), published by the American Psychological Association (APA).It is the definitive guide to identifying and treating mental health conditions in the United States. Any interviews included in a research paper must be conducted with respected industry experts – no Robert Gerard Eardley or similarly disgraced source whose license was lifted for unethical practices.Expert sources certainly punch up papers and provide more in-depth insight, but you shouldn’t rely on them too much to support a thesis; interviews have obviously not undergone the same peer-review process used to vet journal articles.When it comes to online resources, Morris heavily discourages Wikipedia.“Knowing what’s viable ahead of time can be tricky,” Lo Bello says.“One might have to be prepared to abandon a topic if the literature base is inadequate or the topic is just too advanced for the student’s level of preparation.” Consider a few different topics to ensure at least one yields enough information and lends itself to a credible thesis.