”What your friend is actually wondering is what type of reasoning you used to make your claim and what evidence you can present to illustrate the validity of your claim.The terms inductive and deductive reasoning might be pretty fuzzy in your mind right now.That conclusion is based on the specific evidence you evaluate.
”What your friend is actually wondering is what type of reasoning you used to make your claim and what evidence you can present to illustrate the validity of your claim.Tags: Charles Lamb Essays South Sea House SummaryExample Of A Methodology For A Research PaperTo What Extent Is The Turner Thesis ValidWrite Assignments For Money UkOrganizational Power And Politics EssayExample Of An Outline Of An EssayTexas A&M DissertationsWhat Is An Informational EssayBiomedical Phd Thesis
In other words, without supporting one's point, the conclusion is weak.
Let’s say you’re sitting in class, and you make any random claim like “Professor Smith never eats fast food” or “the neighbor’s dog is stealing my dog’s toys.”Your friend might tell you to “prove it” or might ask, “How do you know?
Most likely, however, you will likely decide that it has rained. Based on your life experience and likely factors, the most logical deduction is that a wet street is the result of rainfall.
There are other possibilities, but the most logical deduction is rain.
Deductive reasoning is commonly used in police work, investigative reporting, the sciences (including medicine), law, and, oddly enough, literary analysis. Each paragraph focuses on a particular aspect or a particular point, using detail and examples to lead to a specific conclusion.
The support for one's conclusion is the most important factor.In this example, even though your professor made numerous negative comments about fast food restaurants, you might learn that he occasionally (or even frequently) eats at them.Because your original conclusion is invalid, you might examine the evidence again to draw different conclusions.Keep in mind, though, that your conclusion might not always be valid.It’s perfectly acceptable to change your theory and/or reach new conclusions after you examine new evidence.He’s not expressing a personal opinion or stating his personal dining preferences.When you’re using inductive reasoning, you’re presenting a conclusion based on specific facts, examples, or observations. You’re using evidence to help you develop that theory.)You may choose to use inductive reasoning when writing a narrative essay, a work of fiction, or perhaps a persuasive essay.If, however, you were SURE that there had been no rain, or you were aware of a street cleaning program, your deduction would change appropriately.Deductive reasoning takes the MOST REASONABLE, LIKELY path, but is not necessarily fool-proof.It uses specific examples to create a more generalized theory. Let’s also say that this pattern continues on a somewhat regular basis.Throughout the semester, he makes negative comments about the nutritional value of fast food.