He regarded reflection as the product of sensation, especially the sensation of touch.
Condillac form of sensationism, held that all knowledge comes from the senses.
Much of the difficulty is owed to a general failure among scholars to consider how history, philosophy, and politics work together.
Rethinking the Enlightenment bridges these disciplinary divides.
What epistemic assumptions framed eighteenth-century thinkers' speculations regarding origins? The best way to understand the Enlightenment's obsession with origins is to study it in conjunction with the contemporary conceptualization of originality as a criterion of aesthetic value, Catherine Labio maintains.
Her expansive survey of the era's thought places special emphasis on epistemology and is genuinely interdisciplinary, drawing on such fields as anthropology, geometry, historiography, literary criticism, and political economy.The first, published in 1746, was an Condillac asked his readers to imagine a naïve thinker—a statue of a human being—and how that thinker might learn if a sensory avenue, say smell, was developed in isolation of the other senses. His aim in this thought-experiment was to show how a person could know all that he knows from sensory experience. Regarding language, Condillac’s depicted it as a vehicle for transforming the senses into mental objects. He believed that language was structured in the same way as thought. Condillac is best known for two of his philosophical works, both on the role of sensation and experience in the development of cognition. Now unfolding the fascinating story behind its mystique this 2002 book provides for the first time a comprehensive cultural and ecological history of European impact, from early voyages of discovery to developments in Reef science and management.Incisive and a delight to read in its thorough account of the scientific, social and environmental consequences of European impact on the world's greatest coral reef system, this extraordinary book is sure to become a classic."In selecting the subjects of the Essays contained in the First Part of this volume, I have had a view chiefly to the correction of some mistaken opinions concerning the origin of our Knowledge (or, to use the more common phraseology, concerning the origin of our Ideas) which, as they are naturally suggested by certain figurative modes of speaking, sanctioned by the highest authorities, are apt to warp the judgment in studying the most elementary principles of abstract science.The Essays which fill up the rest of the volume have no necessary dependence on the disquisitions to which they are subjoined; and may perhaps be read with some interest by readers who have little relish for scholastic controversy* The choice, however, even of these, was not altogether arbitrary ; as, I trust, will appear evident to such as may honour the whole series with an attentive perusal"--Book.He followed in the tradition of philosophical scholars of his time, building especially upon the empirical tradition of John Locke (1632-1704).While Locke differentiated two sources of ideas, sensation and reflection, Condillac forwarded only one, sensation.