Instead of focusing on political power, Washington believed that the African-American needed to focus on personal development.Secondly, Washington had asked for African-Americans to give up their civil rights. Their opposing philosophies can be found in much of today’s discussions over how to end class and racial injustice, what is the role of black leadership, and what do the ‘haves’ owe the ‘have-nots’ in the black community. Washington, educator, reformer and the most influentional black leader of his time (1856-1915) preached a philosophy of self-help, racial solidarity and accomodation.
Instead of focusing on political power, Washington believed that the African-American needed to focus on personal development.Secondly, Washington had asked for African-Americans to give up their civil rights.Tags: Problem Solving For ToddlersPre-Algebra Homework Practice WorkbookEssay Grading Software MacCheats For HomeworkThe Mythical Man-Month Essays On Software Engineering EbookFavorite Food EssayEssays Tires Pa
However, the latter advocated withdrawal from the mainstream in the name of economic advancement.
This interesting 1965 article by writer Ralph Mc Gill in The Atlantic combines an interview with Du Bois shortly before his death with Mc Gill’s analysis of his life.
He further stated that all nine million Negros could not make progress in economic despair if they had no political rights or educational opportunity.
Thus, Washington’s proposal that blacks should take accountability for themselves was not only unfounded, but also paradoxical.
Instead of focusing on gaining equality and civil rights, the black American needed to strengthen his own position in society and not focus on his position in relation to others.
Finally, the African-American needed to give up higher education.
In the interview, Du Bois discusses Booker T., looks back on his controversial break with him and explains how their backgrounds accounted for their opposing views on strategies for black social progress Here is the full text of this classic in the literature of civil rights.
It is a prophetic work anticipating and inspiring much of the black consciousness and activism of the 1960s.
Du Bois contends that radicals saw this speech as an act of surrender to the white race.
African-Americans, they believed, were accepting their place in society.