Tags: My Personal Philosophy Of Success EssayBuy Essay WritingExplanatory Essay PromptsLetter Of Recommendation For ApplicantThesis For Love And Hate In JamestownDrugs Essay In English
For instance, in the argument above, you don’t need real facts or statistics about the financial implications of workplace safety.You just need to know that those facts and statistics aren’t in the argument, and thus could be anything, potentially impacting the validity of the argument.
Remember how we said the argument is a lot like a Critical Reasoning stimulus?
The process of evaluating it is a lot like the one we use for Critical Reasoning stimuli too.
You’re free to make up all kinds of hypothetical scenarios for your argument essay (whether they’re accurate or not), so don’t feel pressured to be a subject matter expert.
Tip #3 | Treat It Like Critical Reasoning — Find the Gaps So how do we successfully analyze an argument?
This means that it doesn’t matter if you think the proposal being made is a good or a bad idea, or even if the alternative conclusions you bring up to weaken the argument are good or bad ideas!
As an example, let’s take a look at an argument from the GMAC website: “Most companies would agree that as the risk of physical injury occurring on the job increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase.However, AWA doesn’t get nearly as much attention in test prep resources as Quantitative and Verbal do, leaving many test takers unsure of how to approach this elusive section.In this article, we’ll give a quick overview of the GMAT argumentative essay section, then give 7 argument essay tips for a high AWA score. The AWA, or Analytical Writing Assessment, section of the GMAT is made up of one short piece of writing called the “Analysis of an Argument” essay.It just matters that the argument being made isn’t necessarily valid.Similarly, what is actually true in the real world doesn’t actually matter.After the argument, the same prompt is always given, asking the test taker to evaluate the argument: “Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument.In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument.Some test takers take this first sentence of the prompt to mean that the argument may be well-reasoned as is or that they should focus on elements of the argument they think are particularly sound.But this misses the point of all the extremely negative language in the other sentences of the prompt: in AWA, the argument is always flawed, and your argumentative essay should focus on an analysis of those flaws.This gap can either be bridged to strengthen the argument or widened to weaken the argument.To adequately predict an answer for strengthen/weaken questions, we need to identify the gap.